Editorial Policy

We have a dedicated editorial team that inspects every submitted manuscript. They will return the draft to the author if your file is incorrect or has missing content. Once the document is approved by the editors and clears the initial screening, it will be passed on for review.

The editorial staff handles everything. They even assign a relevant reviewer from the same field or domain. Editors have to make the decision whether to accept, reject, accept with minor revisions, or accept with major revisions. This decision is based on the comments or feedback received from the reviewers.

Reviewers are responsible for making the recommendations, but they should know that editors always have the final call. The decision given by the editorial team will be considered final.

In a scenario where a submission has mixed reviews, and the editing team can’t make a decision, they go for another round of peer review. This way, several recommendations are collected, and the decision is taken based on what the majority says. If the submission receives any negative comments, then the author has to justify those remarks or else their manuscript could be rejected or kept on hold. It is crucial to clear the critical evaluation of the publishers.

We have carefully established this peer review system. It plays a vital role in refining your work and publishing the best possible version of your manuscript. The publishers have the authority to ask for a review one more time from a different reviewer if they feel that editorial team has not done justice while making the decision.